Every problem in the chapter beside the book’s answer, a chapter at a time as you scroll.
Chapter 2: Patent Enforcement
19 problems · 0 figures2-2 §2.AQ source ↗
- a.The exclusive right to “practice” the patent—meaning the exclusive right to make or sell products based on the patent.
- b.The right to exclude others from making, using, offering for sale, selling, or importing the invention covered by the patent throughout the United States.
- c.Both of these.
Answer
2-3 §2.AQ source ↗
- a.Intending to infringe the patent.
- b.Making, using, or selling the patented invention without authorization.
- c.Knowing that the patent exists.
Answer
2-4 §2.AQ source ↗
- a.One or more of a patent’s claims match (or “read on”) the features and functions of a device or process.
- b.A device or process that performs a “substantially similar” functions to those described in a patent’s claims.
- c.Both of the above are correct.
Answer
2-5 §2.AQ source ↗
- a.If a device performs substantially the same function in substantially the same way as your patent claim, infringement exists if any differences are insignificant.
- b.A patent calling for an “adhesive” connection (describing glue as the preferred adhesive) may be infringed by a device using a Velcro® fastener.
- c.Both of the above are correct.
Answer
2-6 §2.AQ source ↗
- a.Two. You can sue the infringer in federal court, or ignore the infringement.
- b.Three. Besides the two above, you can simply demand he stop infringing.
- c.Four. You can sue the infringer, demand he stop infringing and pay monetary damages, offer the infringer a license in return for royalties, or ignore it.
Answer
2-7 §2.AQ source ↗
- a.Litigation financing in exchange for a share of any damages.
- b.Out-of-court license and royalty settlements.
- c.Contingency lawyers take the case for a share of any damages.
- d.All of the above.
Answer
2-9 §2.AQ source ↗
- a.Always. This gives them the opportunity to settle prior to you filing a costly suit.
- b.Never. They can then sue you preemptively, giving them the vital initiative in seeking a venue of their choice and a declaratory judgement of noninfringement.
- c.Yes, but only if you file suit simultaneously or shortly afterwards.
Answer
2-11 §2.AQ source ↗
- a.Improper jurisdiction.
- b.Improper venue.
- c.Improper (or invalid) patent.
- d.Failure to state a proper claim.
Answer
2-12 §2.AQ source ↗
- a.The patent is invalid.
- b.The patent is not infringed.
- c.The plaintiff waited too long to file suit.
- d.The patent covers a nonessential part of the allegedly infringing product.
Answer
2-13 §2.AQ source ↗
- a.The PTO is less likely to judge that a patent has been infringed.
- b.It's quicker than waiting for a trial.
- c.The PTO has shown a strong likelihood of finding challenged patents invalid.
Answer
2-14 §2.AQ source ↗
- a.Through production of documents and interrogatories, either side may discover information that may be decisive in confirming or rebutting infringement claims.
- b.Discovery is often an endless fishing expedition that escalates the costs to both parties exponentially.
- c.Both of these describe the role of discovery in an infringement case.
Answer
2-15 §2.AQ source ↗
- a.Discovery.
- b.Summary Judgment.
- c.Claims construction (or Markman) hearings.
- d.The Verdict.
Answer
2-16 §2.AQ source ↗
- a.You need an odd number of jurors to break a tie vote on the verdict.
- b.Six jurors won’t be enough for a legal verdict if one is excused during trial, and twelve jurors will likely take too long to decide the case.
Answer
2-17 §2.AQ source ↗
- a.The facts of the case, not each party’s moral views, are all that matters to a jury.
- b.It is immoral to spend $3 million to $10 million on a patent suit.
- c.Each party casts itself as in the right and its opponent as doing them wrong.
Answer
2-18 §2.AQ source ↗
- a.Deceiving or misleading the patent office to grant a patent.
- b.Deceiving or misleading a jury during opening arguments.
- c.Deceiving or misleading the opposing party during the discovery phase.
Answer
2-19 §2.AQ source ↗
- a.Selling a product despite knowing that a patent exists that the product might be infringing.
- b.Selling a product despite an objectively high likelihood that it infringed a valid patent and that this risk was known or should have been known to the infringer.
- c.Deliberately not conducting a prior art search to determine if a patent exists that your product might be infringing.
Answer
2-20 §2.AQ source ↗
- a.Convincing evidence of bad faith or gross negligence by the losing party.
- b.A case that “stands out from others” in the weakness of the plaintiff’s case or the unreasonable or abusive manner in which it was litigated.
Answer
2-21 §2.AQ source ↗
- a.A very large award for monetary damages.
- b.Pre- and post judgment interest payments on the damage award.
- c.Injunctive relief barring further sales of the infringer’s products.
Answer
2-22 §2.AQ source ↗
- a.The cost of an appeal is orders of magnitude less than the cost of the trial itself.
- b.Legal issues such as claim construction are reviewed de novo - meaning, without regard to the previous trial’s rulings.
- c.The U.S. Court for the Federal Circuit, the appeals court, affirms in full less than 60 percent of the patent cases it decides on the merits.
- d.All of the above.
Answer
Loading chapter 3…
Problems and answers are adapted from Introduction to Intellectual Property by David Kline, Bernard Cassidy and Steve Fox, attributed to The Michelson 20MM Foundation and published by OpenStax, and are used under the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 licence. Access for free at https://openstax.org/books/introduction-intellectual-property/pages/1-introduction. Changes were made to the original material, including updates to art, structure, and other content updates. Art is credited in its own caption wherever the book credits it. This adaptation is released under the same licence, is non-commercial, and is neither affiliated with nor endorsed by OpenStax, Rice University or The Michelson 20MM Foundation.